Numerical completion of the long weighted chains

Independent AG-GS exposition, CC0 1.0. Written in the existing AG-GS author workflow (its recorded writer is GPT-6.1 Sol, Ultra); reproduced here without mathematical change. The native numerical classification and heart bound remain the human Stacks/AI Integrated Stacks GFDL components. This excerpt is NS.11a only and does not admit the unrestricted residue-field claim in the following NS.11.

Numerical completion NS.11a. The long weighted chains in the curve provider. The native proof of models-lemma-bound-wm leaves two weighted-chain cases and the long fork case to the reader. The following supplies those cases, so the required bound is not imported with an unfinished exercise.

Use the native numerical-type notation: \(A=(a_{ij})\) is symmetric, \(Am=0\), \(m_i,w_i>0\), \(w_i\mid a_{ij}\); at a \((-2)\)-vertex, \(a_{ii}=-2w_i\). A one-vertex type has \(A=0\) and torsion-free numerical Picard group, so assume more than one vertex. Let \(J\) be the non-\((-2)\)-vertices. The proved heart bound is \(m_j|a_{jj}|\le6g\) for \(j\in J\). The equation at \(j\) gives, for a neighbour \(i\), \[ m_i a_{ij}\le m_j|a_{jj}|, \qquad m_iw_i\le m_j|a_{jj}|. \tag{NS.11a} \] In particular a \((-2)\)-vertex attached to \(J\) has \(m_iw_i\le6g\). Each successive \((-2)\)-edge can at most double the bound on \(m_i|a_{ii}|\). The native proper-subgraph classification says that every remaining short component has graph distance at most seven from \(J\); its small diagrams and the \(E_6,E_7,E_8\) diagrams have diameter at most six. Thus these components satisfy \(m_i|a_{ii}|\le2^7(6g)=768g\). The only components with unbounded length are the following chains and fork. The classification and the heart bound are retained at their exact proved earlier native locators; we now finish their bound.

In an unweighted chain, all \(w_i=w\) and consecutive \(a_{i,i+1}=w\). The multiplicities obey \(2m_i\ge m_{i-1}+m_{i+1}\) at internal vertices, with equality precisely when that vertex has no neighbour in \(J\). A maximum plateau either has an internal boundary with a smaller neighbour, in which case the inequality is strict and that vertex attaches to \(J\), or reaches an endpoint with no smaller internal neighbour. At such an endpoint the residual in \(Am=0\) is \(wm_i>0\), so it also attaches to \(J\). Hence the maximum multiplicity occurs at an attached vertex, giving \(wm_i\le6g\) throughout the chain.

In the first weighted chain, \(w_1=\cdots=w_{t-1}=w\), \(w_t=2w\), ordinary edges have weight \(w\) and the last edge has weight \(2w\). Put \(x_i=m_i\) for \(i<t\) and \(x_t=2m_t\). Then \(w_i m_i=wx_i\), all internal inequalities are \(2x_i\ge x_{i-1}+x_{i+1}\), and the terminal equation gives \(x_t\ge x_{t-1}\), with equality if vertex \(t\) has no neighbour in \(J\). If \(t\) is a maximum and the inequality is strict, it is attached and \(wx_t\le6g\). Otherwise the maximum-plateau argument just given finds an attached maximum at an ordinary vertex or at the other endpoint. Thus again every \(w_i m_i\le6g\).

In the second weighted chain, \(w_1=\cdots=w_{t-1}=2w\), \(w_t=w\), and all edges have weight \(2w\). The original \(m_i\) obey the ordinary internal concavity inequalities, and \(m_t\ge m_{t-1}\), with equality if \(t\) is unattached. The same plateau argument finds a maximum at an attached vertex. If it is an ordinary vertex, \(2w\max m_i\le6g\); if it is \(t\), \(w\max m_i\le6g\). In both cases \(w_i m_i\le12g\) throughout, and so \(m_i|a_{ii}|\le24g\).

For the long fork, all weights are \(w\). Number its long path \(1,\ldots,t-1\), with leaves \(t,t+1\) at vertex \(t-1\). Put \(s=m_t+m_{t+1}\). The path followed by \(s\) satisfies ordinary concavity, because the fork inequality is \(2m_{t-1}\ge m_{t-2}+s\); the two leaf equations give \(s\ge m_{t-1}\). A maximum plateau contained in the path has an attached maximum unless it extends to the terminal \(s\). If \(s\) is a maximum and both leaves are unattached, their equations give \(m_t=m_{t+1}=m_{t-1}/2\), hence \(s=m_{t-1}\). The plateau then either has an attached path boundary or extends to the first endpoint, whose positive residual makes it attached. This gives \(ws\le6g\). If both leaves are attached, (NS.11a) gives \(ws\le12g\). If just one is attached, say \(t\), the other has \(m_{t+1}=m_{t-1}/2\); since \(s\ge m_{t-1}\), we get \(m_t\ge m_{t-1}/2\) and \(s\le2m_t\). Again \(ws\le12g\). A larger path maximum instead has an attached plateau boundary and is bounded by \(6g/w\). Thus every vertex in the fork satisfies \(m_i|a_{ii}|\le24g\). This completes every long case and the bound \(768g\). The off-diagonal bounds follow from (NS.11a), applied with its already bounded neighbouring diagonal. \(\square\)